Archive for May, 2005

14 May 2005



Hans Henrik H. Heming

Posted in Design Management

No Comments »

How many times didn’t we see products and productdesigners who have recieved awards? Red dot’s-whatever?

As an informative reference book the red dot design yearbook 2005/2006 illustrates current trends associated with design award winning, innovative products of all trades, from consumer electronics to furniture.

Well-known designers get a chance to speak there describing the exiting path from the idea to the product - a must for all businesspeople, designers, journalists and all those interested in design.

Read more here.

ReddotWhat I think these books and awards are missing is acknowledging the process – the way to the outstanding product, service or businessperformance.

Few days ago I had the opportunity to have a brief face2face discussion with the chief designer at Decathlon. Right now I can’t remember his name - sorry. He assured me that design isn’t a process – only Engineers sees it that way – it’s merely the ability to construct a process.

I haven’t made my own opinion yet, but assuming he is right I think it would be worth considering to make an award for the best designed process.

What do you think? How do you describe design? Any META-definitions around?

 

14 May 2005



CPH127 Linkbot

Posted in del.icio.us

No Comments »

 

13 May 2005



Hans Henrik H. Heming

Posted in Design Management

7 Comments »

IBM just announced that they will move into the lucrative marketarea of design management.         

We design as a process,
centered around understanding your customers. Our experience spans 50
years of designing IT-specific products with a human focus. And because
we’re directly connected to IBM research, we’re the place where user
needs and innovation meet.

Read more from IBM.

What will that mean? Will other well known consultants move into the business as well? What can we expect, and what are the conditions for doing so ?

I got it from core77

 

13 May 2005



CPH127 Linkbot

Posted in del.icio.us

No Comments »

 

12 May 2005



Jacob Bøtter

Posted in Uncategorized

No Comments »

I’ve had this laying on my powerbook for way too long. I wrote it even before we launched CPH127 (at that time codenamed HCAB27), that is now 70-some days ago.

Do you run a security company with a green logo and approaching the
French market, you are in big trouble. In France green is similar to
criminality, where as in the US it is equal to safety. The other way
around, it wouldn’t be a good idea to focus on white if you provide
health care services and want to approach the Asian markets. In both
China and Japan white is perceived as death, where as in France and the
US it indicates neutrality and purity.

A cheap trick would
be to stick with a colour like blue, which in the most parts of the
world is perceived positively. It is, though, worth considering that
you would have to differentiate and most corporations already have most
of their designing done in blue nuances. It is however possible to
consider these terms in order to plan your process towards an effective
design to support your marketing efforts.

On the web a hot
buzzword for the time is User Experience, or just UX as some prefer to
refer to it. Having a good User Experience on your global website
requires you to do specific market research in various countries in
order to approach each country right. A company that puts a lot of
effect into this is Nokia, which has done a lot of research in
cross-cultural differences and employ usability experts in India and
Africa. They even wrote an excellent book on the subject.

Since we launched in the beginning of March we have had visitors from United States, Denmark, United Kingdom, Canada, Netherlands, France, Australia, Germany, South Africa, Spain, Russia, India, Italy, Portugal, Sweden, Japan, Estonia, New Zealand, Finland, Belgium, Brazil, Taiwan, Singapore, Poland, Turkey, Norway, Romania, Hong Kong, Switzerland, Israel, China, Mexico, Austria, South Korea, Bahrain, Malaysia, Argentina, Ukraine, Croatia, Slovenia, Ireland, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Uruguay, Chile, Greece, United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Philippines, Ghana, Iceland, Thailand, Morocco, Lebanon, Colombia, Bangladesh, Czech Republic, Macedonia, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Lithuania, Peru, Syrian Arab Republic, Latvia, Hungary, Costa Rica, Trinidad and Tobago, Oman, Indonesia and Tanzania. Maybe we should start thinking about global design? (The countrynames are sorted by the number of visitors)

 

12 May 2005



Jacob Bøtter

Posted in Rants

No Comments »

This morning I had a great meeting with Hans Henrik and Magnus (the two other founders of this blog) and Magnus made a very good point in the middle of the conversation. Some designers had told him (and Hans Henrik) that they (Magnus and Hans Henrik) weren’t talking about design, they were talking about business processes, business management - evolving business, not design. That’s exactly our point here, this is not the place to dwell looking at great photos of nice design. We love aesthetics too, but we are more into changing business and optimizing business. We could have called this business design, new design or any other buzz word - but that would simply be too fuzzy don’t you think?

Anyhow, I thought I would do some public service here because some of you are
very interested in design. One of the things that we do very well in my
mothercountry (Denmark) is furniture - design of furniture that is. The
upcoming hot furniture fair ICFF
has got some promising new talents,
and here’s a list of danish exhibitors that I gathered at their
website. If you are in New York City and a design-lover, you should
attend this fair. Even though we talk a lot about processes, business
cases and management - visually appleasing design is still our main
driving force.

Danish exhibitors at ICFF:

I guess this list will make up for all of this misunderstanding of our perception of design (more about this some other time.

 

12 May 2005



CPH127 Linkbot

Posted in del.icio.us

No Comments »

 

11 May 2005



Alex

Posted in Design Process

No Comments »

Here’s an interesting conference on providing " a forum to discuss the design of better products and services through understanding the needs of people."

Ambient Intelligence; Worklife Balance and Mobility; e-Learning and Corporate Innovation will be among the topics under discussion.

http://www.essex.ac.uk/chimera/PII/Summary.htm

21st to the 23rd of September hosted by the University of Essex.

Sounds promising…

 

11 May 2005



Hans Henrik H. Heming

Posted in Product Design & Development

No Comments »

Design is nowadays more about “meaning”, “identity” and “emotion” rather than “cost”, “prize” and “performance”.

Ever thought of how to link design with emotion?

Blomst_1Volkswagen has it right.

Marc Hedlund at Signal vs. Noise has a take on the idea of adding features to products that help customers form strong emotional connections/attachments with them.

Do you know of any other great examples?

 

11 May 2005



Alex

Posted in Product Design & Development

1 Comment »

In the spirit of starting on a critical note, I thought I’d share some thoughts with you about innovation in product design.

I am now involved in an international competition to design toys for a well-known (read internationally known american) company looking to innovate in the way toys will cater to future generations. This type of approach, although seemingly noble, is very much about getting inspired by other creative processes (namely in this case educational), licensing, or buying out the competition. R&D is being reduced in these types of established markets because of their ability to be lazy about investing in their own development and think about what they are doing wrong and what perhaps others might be doing right.

I feel that this leads to a lack of realism on what innovation actually means. Good ideas can be bought but at some point a touch of self-analysis can do some good. To stay in touch with what people are looking for, to understand users not in terms of shelf space , age group or budget but also in terms of their experience with the brand or the products they sell. Where do the opportunities lie in that relationship through time? What can be extracted from perhaps looking at how people interact with a product over 10 years?

The ideas that can come out of this type of thinking will defintely have an impact on how innovative a design process in a company can become and avoid the laziness of living off of its buying power and one day find itself unable to keep up with what is really going on.

Just a few thoughts on a subject I will surely come back to.

A

 

Page 4 of 6« First...«23456»